The death of a Fifth Monarchy man

Home / Today in Church History / The death of a Fifth Monarchy man

Incidents in the Rebellion of the Fifth Monarchy Men under Thomas Venner, and the Execution of their Leaders

‘Tis prophecied in the Revelation, that the Whore of Babylon shall be destroyed with fire and sword and what do you know, but this is the time of her ruin, and that we are the men that must help to pull her down?’
John Rogers, 1657

‘A thing that never was heard of, that so few men should dare and do so much mischief.’
Samuel Pepys, 1661

On this day in 1661 Thomas Venner was executed in London for treason, suffering the usual punishment of traitors: being hanged, drawn and quartered. He had led a rebellion against the English government in the name of the Fifth Monarchy, violently rampaging through London before being cornered in a tavern and his men shot to pieces.

The English Civil War of the 1640s had pitted defenders of the Stuart monarchy against supporters of a Puritan-dominated Parliament. The chaos engendered allowed a number of extravagant fringe movements to develop: “Ranters”, amoral pantheists who found virtue in blasphemy; “Levellers” who wanted an end to social distinctions; and agrarian socialist “Diggers”. Among the most radical were the believers in the Fifth Monarchy, an idea taken from the Book of Daniel where King Nebuchadnezzar dreamt of a final kingdom that would last forever. They were millennialists, confident that the End Times were near and they hoped to set up an English theocracy before witnessing the conversion of the Jews and Moslems and the return of Christ. Some Fifth Monarchy Men were hoping to accomplish their goals peacefully but others such as Thomas Venner, a London cooper, were prepared to use force to overturn the government. In 1661, hoping to prevent the re-establishment of the Anglican Church and the Stuart monarchy he led an uprising of a few hundred men under the slogan “King Jesus and the heads upon the Gates”. For a few days they controlled parts of London before being trapped and overcome by regular army troops. Wounded 19 times, Venner was placed quickly on trial and executed with other of his surviving men.

The Fifth Monarchy movement abandoned its violent wing and continued to press for reform and hope in the Second Coming well into the 18th century.

January 14

hilario

St Hilary’s Day

St Hilary of Poitiers (300-368) was a Gaulish bishop who was one of the most prominent defenders of Trinitarianism in the western empire. A convert from paganism, he turned his considerable learning against the Arian heresy which denied the divinity of Christ. The 325 Council of Nicaea had condemned this view of the Godhead but Arianism was protected by emperors and many churchmen in the middle of the fourth century — for these men the notion that Christ was a powerful but inferior creation was the best way to cling to monotheism. Like many who defended the Trinity in this era, Hilary was persecuted and sent into exile. In time, his writings won him recall to Poitiers and he spent the rest of his life battling the Arian heretics.  He said: “For one to attempt to speak of God in terms more precise than he himself has used — to undertake such a thing is to embark upon the boundless, to dare the incomprehensible. He fixed the names of His nature: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Whatever is sought over and above this is beyond the meaning of words, beyond the limits of perception, beyond the embrace of understanding.” Hilary is the patron saint of those who suffer from snake-bite.

January 11

347

Birth of a Trinitarian emperor.

In the fourth century Christianity had, at last, become a legally-tolerated religion, able to own property, preach openly and overtly influence Roman society. Though the royal family of Constantine had accepted Christianity, the majority of the empire was still pagan and, moreover, the faith was harshly divided theologically. On one hand were the Arians who asserted absolute monotheism and who denied full divinity to Christ; on the other were the Trinitarians who saw a single God in three persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The Council of Nicaea in 325 had decided emphatically for the Trinitarian position but the emperors after Constantine were largely Arian.

Theodosius, born in Spain in 347, became a general and fought his way to the imperial throne of the eastern empire in 379 and ruler of the whole empire by 393, the last emperor to rule an undivided Roman realm. His reign was largely spent battling Germanic invaders and usurping generals but his career had great consequences for Christianity.

In 380 he decreed that the Trinitarian position was to be the true form of religion; he expelled Arian bishops and acted strongly against paganism. He disbanded the Vestal Virgins, banned animal sacrifice, halted the Olympic Games, ended state subsidies to pagan cults and closed polytheistic temples, decreeing that “no one is to go to the sanctuaries, walk through the temples, or raise his eyes to statues created by the labor of man”.

A riot in Thessalonica in 390 resulted in the murder of some of Theodosius’s troops; in retaliation he ordered a massacre of the civilian population. This outraged Christian leaders and the bishop of Milan, Ambrose, demanded that Theodosius do penance for the crime and excommunicated him until he did so. (see the Van Eyck painting above) The submission of the emperor to the bishop was often cited for the next thousand years as a symbol of the relationship between church and state.

The death of Theodosius in 395 was a disaster for the Roman imperium and civilization. Rule was split between two of his incompetent sons and within a generation the western empire had fallen to the barbarians.

January 9

Home / Today in History / January 9

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

1916

The end of the Battle of Gallipoli

One of the most consequential battles of the 20th century took place beside the straits that lead from the Aegean Sea to the Black Sea. On April 25, 1915 Allied forces began to land on the Gallipoli peninsula as part of a plan to capture Constantinople, capital of the Ottoman Empire and thus drive Turkey, a German ally, out of the First World War. Less than nine months later after bloody stalemate, the British, French, Australian, New Zealand troops withdrew, with a regiment of Newfoundlanders serving as the rear guard covering their retreat.

Instead of victoriously marching up the peninsula toward Constantinople, the Allies barely succeeded in penetrating the hills beyond the beaches. The Turks, under the command of German officers and a colonel by the name of Mustafa Kemal, held the heights tenaciously at great cost to both sides. With trenches mere yards apart at some points, the fighting was often vicious and personal. Casualties were high and eventually the Allies chose to withdraw and abandon the ambitious plan.

The fall-out of this defeat was enormous. Both present-day Turkey, New Zealand and Australia regard it as a foundational moment in their histories. Kemal would go on to overthrow the Ottoman Empire and become known as Atatürk, the founder of a secular, new republic. Winston Churchill, whose brainchild the invasion was, lost his job as head of the Admiralty and amphibious invasions were regarded with great trepidation until the success of the D-Day landings in 1944. Most importantly, the failure to clear a path to the Black Sea prevented the western Allies from reaching Russia with supplies. Russia’s subsequent military set-backs led directly to the overthrow of the Czar, the establishment of a nascent democracy, and the toppiling of that democracy by the Bolsheviks. The history of the 20th century would have been vastly different if the Allies ahd won at Gallipoli.

January 7

Home / Today in History / January 7

St Distaff’s Day

January 7 is so called because the Christmas season in the United Kingdom ended on Epiphany, and on the following day women returned to their distaffs or daily work. It is also called Rock Day, after the antique term for a distaff. A seventeenth-century poem by Thomas Herrick states:

St. Distaff’s Day; Or, the Morrow after Twelfth-day

Partly work and partly play
You must on St. Distaffs Day:
From the plough soon free your team;
Then cane home and fother them:
If the maids a-spinning go,
Burn the flax and fire the tow.
Bring in pails of water then,
Let the maids bewash the men.
Give St. Distaff all the right:
Then bid Christmas sport good night,
And next morrow every one
To his own vocation.

 

A Hot Time in Parliament

Home / Today in History / A Hot Time in Parliament

attempted_arrest_of_the_five_members_by_charles_west_cope-12iy6wm

 

1642 Charles I invades the House of Commons

Animosity had been growing for years between a large section of the Parliamentary class and the second king of the Stuart dynasty, Charles I. Charles had attempted to rule without Parliament, introduced a number of unpopular and possibly unconstitutional taxes, and given the impression he favoured the return of Catholicism by supporting the Arminian practices of Archbishop Laud and marrying a French Catholic wife. In 1640 he abruptly cancelled the parliamentary sitting when Members demanded reform. In 1642, acting on the rumour that his wife, Queen Henrietta Maria, was to be impeached, Charles brought troops into the House of Commons demanding that five of his critics be arrested.

Sitting in the chair of the Speaker of the House, Charles directed the Speaker to tell him where his opponents had gone. On his knees William Lenthall replied, “May it please your Majesty, I have neither eyes to see nor tongue to speak in this place but as the House is pleased to direct me, whose servant I am here.” The king left in disgust, but his actions had greatly exacerbated tensions and further cast him in the light of a tyrant. Within months the English Civil War had begun.

The Fifth Day of Christmas

Home / Today in Church History / The Fifth Day of Christmas


stthomasbecket_250

The fifth day of Christmas is St Thomas Becket’s Day

1170 The murder of Archbishop Becket.

The twelfth century saw the rise of powerful monarchies in western Europe whose kings were intent on increasing their revenues and scope of jurisdictions. This often brought them into conflict with the papacy, their national churches and the feudal nobility. In England, Henry II (1133-89) sought to repair the damage done by twenty years of anarchy and civil war. He asserted royal power to judge cases hitherto reserved to the local lords; he took back royal lands lost during the chaos; he centralized tax powers; and he intended to reduce the independence of the English church. To the latter end he named his friend Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury.

Becket was not a priest, though like most educated men of his time he took minor religious orders. He had studied canon law, been employed as a diplomat, and served Henry as Lord Chancellor. When Theobald of Bec died in 1162, Henry engineered the election of Becket who to the dismay of the king, took his new priestly vows seriously: he entered on a life of asceticism and defence of the liberties of the English church. In 1164 Henry attempted to introduce the Constitutions of Clarendon, 16 statements limiting the independence of the church, including an end to the abuses of “benefit of clergy” by which priests could not be tried by secular courts. Becket refused to agree and to avoid royal intimidation fled to the Continent. Pope Alexander III brokered a return to England for the Archbishop but Becket soon began opposing the royal will again, this time by excommunicating those clergy who had sided with the king.

When news of Becket’s actions reached Henry in Normandy, the furious monarch is said to have uttered a provocative complaint. Most historians have claimed that Henry said “Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?” but others have attributed to Henry the less pithy plea “What miserable drones and traitors have I nourished and brought up in my household, who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born cleric?” Taking this as a command, four of his knights crossed the Channel to Canterbury where they murdered Becket inside the cathedral.

This outrage caused an international reaction. The pope quickly canonized Becket; Henry II submitted to a whipping by the monks of Canterbury; and the site of Thomas’s tomb became one of Christendom’s great pilgrimage attractions, as we can see in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.

St Thomas Becket is patron saint of London, the English secular clergy, those who hunt with hawks and hounds and those who have lost their horses.

Merry Christmas Everyone!

Home / Christmas / Merry Christmas Everyone!

Here is an editorial I did for the the Frontier Centre for Public Policy:

Yes, Michael, there is a war on Christmas – and you’re part of it

For the last couple of years Toronto writer Michael Coren has been claiming that there is no such thing as “the war on Christmas”. The phenomenon, he said in a nasty moment so uncharacteristic of the charitable tone for which he is renowned, is a “chimera built by conservatives so that they can claim persecution and argue that their rights are being curtailed.”

As a long-time admirer of Mr. Coren, I thought that he might appreciate a contrary view that pointed him to some real facts about the matter. I had, after all, just published Christmas in the Crosshairs: Two Thousand Years of Denouncing and Defending the World’s Most Celebrated Holiday, (Oxford University Press, 2016; a wonderful gift for a loved one at only $27 on Amazon) and I fancied myself a bit of an expert on the subject. So, I wrote Michael a very respectful letter that corrected the errors underlying his mistaken viewpoint and even offered to send him a free copy of my book.

Alas, I received no reply. Now I see that he is up to his old tricks again this year, denying the reality of the Christmas wars while complaining of “the self-prescribed right of Christians to dominate the public square and dictate the private conscience.” So, for Michael and all others who are wondering about that gingerbread-scented whiff of hostility in the air during the holiday season, what follows is the real scoop.

There has always been a war around Christmas. Even before Christians began to celebrate the feast, there was debate about whether it was proper to mark the nativity of Jesus. The early Church was more interested in the imminent return of Christ than in his humble origins and, besides, birthdays, were a bit of a pagan thing. When various dissidents began to insist that Jesus had never had a physical body and was always pure spirit, it suddenly became important to speak about those events at Bethlehem in the reign of Caesar Augustus and to bring up the angels, shepherds, manger and swaddling clothes. Once Christians decided to make a festival out of Christ’s birth, the next argument was when should it be.  Various dates were suggested but the western churches chose December 25 while the great cities of the east opted for January 6; centuries passed before uniformity was achieved. Then the battle was to keep non-Christian elements out of the holiday or to sanctify them – so presents and greenery were acceptable but transvestism and dancing about in animal skins were not.

The Protestant Reformation of the 1500s saw Christmas eliminated in Calvinist territory (Scotland, some American colonies, parts of Switzerland and the Netherlands, and, for a while, England). It took more time, and some occasional violence, before Christmas was almost uniformly popular in churches again, just in time for the twentieth century and forces outside of the faith to join the attack on the holiday.

Countries which adopted Communism such as the Soviet Union and China opted for direct suppression of the festival. Nazi Germany tried to co-opt Christmas and make it into a pagan solstice event while revolutionary governments in Latin America waged war on the American Santa Claus and replaced him with an Aztec serpent-god or a multi-racial jungle dweller. Meanwhile conservative Christians such as the Catholic Archbishop of Liège burnt Santa in effigy and hard-line Protestants in the USA put the old bearded gent on trial and lynched him.

Today the Christmas wars continue on many fronts. In Turkey and India, local religious zealots of an anti-Christian bent attack the holiday as a foreign infidel intrusion. The Chinese government bans university students from having Christmas parties and Jewish rabbis in Jerusalem threaten to yank the kosher certification of hotels which erect Christmas trees. In Europe nationalist sentiment seeks to forbid the appearance of Santa Claus and replace him with the older gift-bringers whom he had, for a time, dislodged – St Nicholas, the Three Kings, angels or the Christ Child.

But the war that gets most notice in the news is the one that is waged by atheists, secularists and the diversity police to privatize Christmas – to drive it back into the home or the church and to create a religion-free public space. No Christmas concerts in schools, no Christmas trees in museums or courthouses, no nativity scenes on town hall lawns, no carols sung in veterans’ hospitals. A town banishes Santa Claus from the Santa Claus parade because he is somehow “too religious”; Chicago’s Christkindl (“Christ Child”) Market bans promotion of a movie about the Nativity because it would be “insensitive to the many people of different faiths who come to enjoy the market for its good and unique gifts.”; Christmas trees become the “Giving Tree”, the “Seasonal Conifer”, the “Tree of Lights”, or least imaginatively, the “Annual Tree”. In the name of multiculturalism a dreary winter monoculture is mandated.

But, say the critics of Christmas, no one really wishes to ban the holiday – just to move it out of sight. The atheist gadfly Christopher Hitchens noted that “there are millions of well-appointed buildings all across the United States, most of them tax-exempt and some of them receiving state subventions, where anyone can go at any time and celebrate miraculous births and pregnant virgins all day and all night if they so desire. These places are known as ‘churches,’ and they can also force passersby to look at the displays and billboards they erect and to give ear to the bells that they ring. In addition, they can count on numberless radio and TV stations to beam their stuff all through the ether. If this is not sufficient, then god damn them. God damn them everyone.”

This is the heart of the matter: the desire to make no space in public for religion. This is a tragic misunderstanding of the binding roles that religions plays in the larger life of the community and fosters an atomistic view of society where social life is conducted only within one’s own group. It leads to identity politics and perpetual claims of victimization. Everyone is poorer if Handel’s Messiah or Mozart’s Requiem or “Silent Night” are considered threats to schoolchildren; if St Patrick’s Day parades or Diwali celebrations or Carnival are kept off the public thoroughfares. Religion is already out on the streets, not just in spectacle and music but in the hospitals, homeless shelters, soup kitchens, sports leagues, after-school programs, homes for the elderly, etc., etc., in which various faiths mandate their followers serve their communities.

In claiming that the war on Christmas is a right-wing plot to assert cultural dominance, Michael Coren has shown himself as, not the truth-seeker which he believes himself to be, but someone who has abandoned the virtues of tolerance and diminished the quantum of goodwill, love, and magic in his country.