Death of an apoplectic earl
Given the heated tenor of recent political exchanges, it seems worthwhile to remember that one may literally burst a blood vessel when arguing with one’s opponents. That was the case with James Stanhope, (1673-1721) the first Earl Stanhope, who was defending his conduct during the infamous Southsea Bubble scandal, a failed investment scheme in which many lost their fortunes and government finances took serious damage. Chamber’s Book of Days notes:
This eminent person carried arms under King William in Flanders; and his Majesty was so struck with his spirit and talent that he gave him a captain’s commission in the Foot Guards, with the rank of lieutenant-colonel, he being then in his 21st year. He also served under the Duke of Schomberg and the Earl of Peterborough; and subsequently distinguished himself as Commander-in-chief of the British forces in Spain. At the close of his military career, he became an active Whig leader in Parliament; took office under Sunderland, and was soon after raised to the peerage. His death was very sudden. He was of constitutionally warm and sensitive temper, with the impetuous bearing of the camp, which he had never altogether shaken off.
In the course of the discussion on the South Sea Company’s affairs, which so unhappily involved some of the leading members of the Government, the Duke of Wharton (Feb. 4th, 1721) made some severe remarks in the House of Lords, comparing the conduct of ministers to that of Sejanus, who had made the reign of Tiberius hateful to the old Romans. Stanhope, in rising to reply, spoke with such vehemence in vindication of himself and his colleagues, that he burst a blood-vessel, and died the next day.
‘May it be eternally remembered,’ says the British Merchant, ‘to the honour of Earl Stanhope, that he died poorer in the King’s service than he came into it. Walsingham, the great Walsingham, died poor; but the great Stanhope lived in the time of South Sea temptations.’