February 21

Home / Today in Church History / February 21

th

1945

The death of Eric Liddell

Eric Liddell (1902-45) was a Scottish athlete and missionary who won fame at the 1924 Olympics and who would be immortalized in the film Chariots of Fire.

Liddell was born in China to missionary parents and lived in that country until he was 5 when he was sent back to Britain to go to school. At his public school and the University of Edinburgh he excelled as an athlete and played international rugby for Scotland. Selected for the British track team for the Paris Olympics of 1924, he decided that he could not participate in 100 metre sprint in which he was a favourite because the heats were run on the Sabbath Day. Instead he competed in the 200 and 400 metre races. Before the latter, a distance at which he had never done particularly well, a member of the American team’s support staff slipped him a note with a quotation from I Samuel 2:30: “Those who honor me I will honor.” Liddell drew the difficult outside lane which meant that for the first part of the race he was unable to see the pace of his competition so he set off at a blistering pace and managed to hang on for the gold medal. The time he set was an Olympic and world record. In the same Games he won a bronze in the 200 metres. These medals came despite an awkward running style that was much mocked.

In 1925 he left for the mission field of China and served as a teacher and ordained minister there until his death, returning to Britain for furlough only rarely. He married the daughter of a Canadian missionary and their family produced three daughters. The invasion of China by Japan forced the missionaries to either flee and abandon their flocks or to move them to areas of greater safety. Liddell sent his wife and children to Canada but remained in China. When his mission was overrun by the Japanese, he was interned in a prison camp. His life there seems also to have been one of exemplary sacrifice and service. Liddell refused to be freed in a prisoner exchange and gave his place to a pregnant woman. He died there in 1945 of a brain tumour.

February 20

Home / Today in Church History / February 20

220px-Portrait_of_Edward_VI_of_England1547

The coronation of England’s first Protestant king

Edward VI (1537-53) was the son of Henry VIII and his third wife, Jane Seymour. Though his father had withdrawn the English Church from obedience to Rome, it was still entirely Catholic in liturgy and theology. Edward, however, was raised among Protestant sympathizers and teachers and during his short reign the nation adopted Protestant church policies.

When his father died in 1547, Edward succeeded to the throne ahead of his older half-sisters, Mary and Elizabeth. Those at court who leaned toward religious reform now became instantly bolder. Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Canterbury, preached a sermon at Edward’s coronation calling the new king a second “Josiah” (a young king of Judah in the 7th century B.C. who attacked idols) and called for him to ensure the “the tyranny of the Bishops of Rome banished from your subjects, and images removed”.

During Edward’s reign, all which was spent under the guidance of regents, clerical celibacy and the mass were abolished, a Protestant Book of Common  Prayer was ordained and the last elements of monasticism were eradicated. Continental reformers were sought as preachers and university teachers. Catholic incumbents who resisted these changes were removed and in some cases imprisoned. In the process, ecclesiastical lands were seized by well-connected courtiers and the English church structure was much weakened.

Edward’s religious reforms seemed doomed when he died at age 15 to be succeeded by his Catholic half-sister Mary whose persecution of Protestantism won her the name “Bloody Mary” but she too died after a brief reign and without issue. The church instituted under Elizabeth I who reigned from 1558 was built on the Edwardian mode.

February 19

Home / Today in Church History / February 19

220px-Spas_vsederzhitel_sinay

842 The Restoration of Icons

For almost a century, the Eastern Christian world was split over the proper use of images in worship. The Ten Commandments expressly forbade the creation of “graven images” and Judaism developed as an aniconic faith, eschewing the visual representation of God as a form of idolatry.

Christians, however much they rejected the worship of idols, felt it was necessary to portray the Godhead inasmuch as Christ had come to earth in human form. To reject depicting him was to fall prey to the Docetic heresy, which claimed that Jesus had only appeared to be human and to reject the goodness of the created world. Thus Christianity developed a rich visual art tradition. This tradition was particularly strong in the East where icons of Jesus and the saints were treated with intense devotion.

When Christian forces suffered losses in the Middle East at the hands of Muslim invaders, many military officers from the border areas began to believe that the Islamic refusal to depict God was a reason for their success; Christianity had fallen into idolatry and was being punished. When one of these generals, Leo III, became emperor he began a period of iconoclasm, a policy followed by his successor Constantine V. Images were destroyed, defaced or painted over, causing popular outrage and clashes with the monasteries which were devotees of images. Ironically, the greatest intellectual supporter of icons was John of Damascus who lived in Muslim-occupied Syria.

For a short time at the end of the century under Empress Irene, icons were restored but the army continued to oppose them. When she was overthrown, iconoclasm was resumed. It was not until February 19, 842, that were icons restored to the churches largely at the instigation of the Empress Theodora. The first Sunday of Lent is still observed as the “Feast of Orthodoxy” in Eastern churches.

The iconoclastic spirit was strong in 16th and 17th century Protestantism which carried out much regrettable destruction of religious art. The current brouhaha over the depiction of the Muslim prophet Mohammed shows the issue is still very much alive.

The icon above is of Christ Pantocrator (Almighty), from the 6th century in the St Catherine monastery, Mount Sinai.

February 18

Home / Today in History / February 18

paston_doc4

Funeral of Sir John Paston

One of the greatest sources for the writing of English social history for the fifteenth century is that collection of the correspondence of a Norfolk gentry family, known as the “Paston Letters.” (A look at the sample of Paston handwriting above will tell you why I chose to base my early-modern English research on printed sources.) In 1466 Sir John Paston, the head of that wealthy family, died; Chamber’s Book of Days records interesting notes about the funeral.

The body of Sir John was conveyed, for interment, to the Priory of Bromholm, in the parish of Barton, a little village on the north-cast coast, and within sight of the sea. A curious roll of accounts of the expenses of the funeral is preserved, from which we gather that for the feast, during three continuous days, one man was occupied in flaying beasts: and provision was made of thirteen barrels of beer, twenty-seven barrels of ale, one barrel of beer of the greatest assize, and a runlet of red wine of fifteen gallons. 

All these, however, copious as they seem, proved inadequate to the demand: for the account goes on to state that five coombs of malt at one time, and ten at another, were brewed up expressly for the occasion. Meat, ton, was in proportion to the liquor: the country round about must have been swept of geese, chickens, capons, and such small gear, all which, with thirteen hundred eggs, thirty gallons of milk, and eight of cream, forty-one pigs, forty calves, and ten ‘nete,’ slain and devoured, give a fearful picture of the scene of festivity within the priory walls. Amongst such provisions, the article of bread bears nearly the same proportion as in Falstaff’s bill of fare. On the other hand, the torches, the many pounds weight of wax to burn over the grave, and the separate candle of enormous stature and girth, form prodigious items. No less than £20 was changed from gold into smaller coin that it might be showered amongst the attendant throng; and twenty-six marks in copper had been used for the same object in London, before the procession began to move. A barber was occupied five days in smartening up the monks for the ceremony: and ‘the reke of the torches at the dirge’ was so great that the glazier had to remove two panes to permit the fumes to escape.

February 17

Home / Today in History / February 17

1024px-Charles_Bell_-_Zoeloe-aanval_op_'n_Boerelaer_-_1838

1838 The Weenen Massacre

The British seizure of Dutch territory in South Africa as a result of the Napoleonic Wars did not sit well with many of the long-established rural settlers. They made three major complaints about British rule: (1) they were not sufficiently protected against native raids on their farms, (2) many British laws, such as the imposition of English as the official language, were resented, and (3) the British abolition of slavery cost them their farm labour with insufficient recompense. In addition, drought conditions caused them to look favourably on lusher land elsewhere. Starting in 1833 many farmers (Boers) began what came to be known as the Great Trek, moving north out of the Cape Colony beyond British jurisdiction.

Sometimes these Voortrekkers were able to come to accommodations with local tribes; sometimes their migration was resisted violently. In 1838 a trek led by Piet Retief negotiated a land settlement with Zulu king Dingane in Natal but when a subsequent delegation met with the king he ordered them to be seized as witches and executed on the spot. Dingane then ordered his warriors to wipe out other Trekker encampments — one such camp near the present town of Weenen was attacked on this date and 500 settlers and native servants were killed.

In December 1838 a small force of Trekkers defeated the Zulu at the Battle of Blood River and made their settlements secure for a time.

February 16

Home / Today in Church History / February 16

Malta-1889-10s.-463x550

The Shipwreck of Paul

On this day is commemorated the shipwreck on Malta suffered by Paul on his way to Rome. The New International Version of Acts 27 reads:

27 On the fourteenth night we were still being driven across the Adriatic Sea, when about midnight the sailors sensed they were approaching land. 28 They took soundings and found that the water was a hundred and twenty feet deep. A short time later they took soundings again and found it was ninety feet deep. 29 Fearing that we would be dashed against the rocks, they dropped four anchors from the stern and prayed for daylight. 30 In an attempt to escape from the ship, the sailors let the lifeboat down into the sea, pretending they were going to lower some anchors from the bow. 31 Then Paul said to the centurion and the soldiers, “Unless these men stay with the ship, you cannot be saved.” 32 So the soldiers cut the ropes that held the lifeboat and let it drift away.

33 Just before dawn Paul urged them all to eat. “For the last fourteen days,” he said, “you have been in constant suspense and have gone without food—you haven’t eaten anything. 34 Now I urge you to take some food. You need it to survive. Not one of you will lose a single hair from his head.” 35 After he said this, he took some bread and gave thanks to God in front of them all. Then he broke it and began to eat. 36 They were all encouraged and ate some food themselves. 37 Altogether there were 276 of us on board. 38 When they had eaten as much as they wanted, they lightened the ship by throwing the grain into the sea.

39 When daylight came, they did not recognize the land, but they saw a bay with a sandy beach, where they decided to run the ship aground if they could. 40 Cutting loose the anchors, they left them in the sea and at the same time untied the ropes that held the rudders. Then they hoisted the foresail to the wind and made for the beach. 41 But the ship struck a sandbar and ran aground. The bow stuck fast and would not move, and the stern was broken to pieces by the pounding of the surf.

42 The soldiers planned to kill the prisoners to prevent any of them from swimming away and escaping. 43 But the centurion wanted to spare Paul’s life and kept them from carrying out their plan. He ordered those who could swim to jump overboard first and get to land. 44 The rest were to get there on planks or on other pieces of the ship. In this way everyone reached land safely.

The stamp pictured below was issued by Malta on the 1,900th anniversary of the wreck. Today tourists can visit Saint Paul’s Bay on Malta. This article discusses the historical accuracy of the claim: http://www.parsagard.com/shipwreck.htm

dd32bfa77ba575cf8189e1a01ea71155

February 15

Home / Today in Church History / February 15

200px-Heiliger_Siegfried

Saint Sigfrid’s Day

(But let us not forget Saints Winaman, Unaman and Sunaman who are also commemorated on this day.)

Evangelizing the pagans of northern Europe was a tough job and, for centuries, the reward for the efforts of Christian priests and monks was death. Many a mission was slaughtered at the water’s edge or after the first sermon denouncing pagan idols. Even some conversions of Nordic kings came to naught when their successors decided that maybe the good old gods were best after all.

Finally, early in the eleventh century, an English monk from the Benedictine Abbey at Glastonbury named Sigfrid succeeded in converting Olof, the King of Sweden, who would be the first Swedish ruler to remain faithful to Christianity until his death. Joining their uncle Sigfrid on the mission front were his nephews Winaman, Unaman and Sunaman who had the misfortune of preaching to obdurate pagans who murdered them and threw their heads in a nearby lake. Sigrid recovered the heads (see above) and these relics were venerated in Sweden until the Protestant Reformation.

Sigfrid won admiration when he refused to allow the murderers to be executed and remitted the blood fine. He died c. 1045, revered as The Second Apostle of the North. (St Ansgar, 801-865, was the First.)

Not the saint you were expecting

Home / Today in Church History / Not the saint you were expecting

Screen Shot 2017-01-25 at 10.02.54 AM

February 14 is, of course, St Valentine’s Day, but the saint commemorated on February 13 is too good to overlook, so, a day late, I give you:

St Dyfnog’s Day

Be not abashed if you are as yet unaware of St Dyfnog, a Welsh saint of surpassing obscurity. He was a priest of the sixth century who served as confessor to a prominent family. Saxon invaders had pressed the native Romano-Britons back into the remoter areas of the island where they maintained their Christianity in the face of the pagan onslaught.

St Dyfnog, Llanrhaeadr-yng-Nghinmeirch in Denbighshire, Wales is built on a site which has been occupied by a church since the 500s when it was founded by its name saint in close proximity to a well with healing powers. Today the well and the church with its magnificent Jesse Window dating from the 16th century are tourist attractions. A Jesse Window is a stained glass creation which depicts the family tree of Jesus.

Follow this link http://stdyfnog.org.uk and then on the Jesse Tree link. This will take you to an image of the window, an explanation of its history and a nifty little feature that allows you to click on it and see which ancestor pops up. Enjoy.

February 13

Home / Today in History / February 13
6292865660_2d0ea08acb_z

1692 The Glencoe Massacre

“Cruel is the snow that sweeps Glencoe and covers the graves o’ Donald” — T.S. Eliot

In the western Scottish Highlands is Glen Coe, a narrow valley of considerable beauty. There, on the morning of February 13, 1692, settlements inhabited by members of the MacDonald clan were set upon and murdered by troops associated with the Campbell clan, a massacre that is still remembered today.

In the fighting that took place after the 1688 ouster of King James II by his daughter Mary and her Dutch husband William of Orange, the highlanders were largely Jacobites — supporters of James. Following their defeat, the new King William offered a pardon to all clans who acknowledged his legitimacy with an oath taken by January 1, 1692. Some clan leaders delayed until the last moment and bad weather prevented one of them, Alastair Maclain, Chief of Glencoe, from doing so until after the deadline expired.

This technical lapse allowed some Scotsmen, hostile to the MacDonalds and highlanders in general, to plot the eradication of the clan. John Dalrymple, Secretary of State Over Scotland, was a lowlander with a desire to break the power of the clan system in northern Scotland. He conspired with leaders of clan Campbell who had a long-standing feud with the MacDonalds to carry out an exemplary extermination of their mutual enemies. He arranged to have troops commanded by a Campbell officer billeted in the homes of Glencoe and to kill their hosts at a pre-arranged time. This is the order given to Captain Robert Campbell who was staying at the house of the MacDonald chieftain:

You are hereby ordered to fall upon the rebells, the McDonalds of Glenco, and put all to the sword under seventy. you are to have a speciall care that the old Fox and his sones doe upon no account escape your hands, you are to secure all the avenues that no man escape. This you are to putt in execution att fyve of the clock precisely; and by that time, or very shortly after it, I’ll strive to be att you with a stronger party: if I doe not come to you att fyve, you are not to tarry for me, but to fall on. This is by the Kings speciall command, for the good & safety of the Country, that these miscreants be cutt off root and branch. See that this be putt in execution without feud or favour, else you may expect to be dealt with as one not true to King nor Government, nor a man fitt to carry Commissione in the Kings service. Expecting you will not faill in the full-filling hereof, as you love your selfe, I subscribe these with my hand  att Balicholis  Feb: 12, 1692.
For their Majesties service (signed) R. Duncanson

On the snowy morning of February 13, the troops in three valley settlements attacked the householders, killing 38 men and burning the homes. An additional 40 women and children would die from exposure having lost their shelter.

The killings created a scandal. The Scottish Parliament ordered an inquiry which declared the deed to be one of murder, an illegitimate order that should have been disobeyed. It demanded that the MacDonalds be recompensed and the guilty officials punished but little was done to enforce this.

The “Red Wedding” episode of Game of Thrones is said to have been based on this massacre.

February 12

Home / Today in History / February 12

300px-PAUL_DELAROCHE_-_Ejecución_de_Lady_Jane_Grey_(National_Gallery_de_Londres,_1834)1554

The execution of Lady Jane Grey

Under the rule of Edward VI (r 1547-53) England became a Protestant country with the Church of England the only legal religion. By 1553 it was clear that Edward did not have long to live and that the heir, according to the will of their father Henry VIII, would be the Catholic loyalist, Edward’s half-sister Mary. The Duke of Northumberland, John Dudley, was the power behind the throne and sought to divert the succession away from Mary by marrying his son Guilford to Lady Jane Grey, a reliably Protestant royal cousin. Edward agreed to this in his will and directed the English political class to submit to Jane on his death.

When Edward died on July 6, 1553, Northumberland kept the death a secret while he tried to gain support for the 16-year-old Jane and arrest Mary. Though Jane was proclaimed Queen, her supporters in the main deserted her for the claims of Mary who was deemed to be the legitimate heir and not the puppet of the unpopular Dudley. After a reign of only 9 days, Jane stepped down and was arrested and imprisoned in the Tower of London. She was found guilty of treason but was not executed.

Early in 1554 a Protestant rebellion led by  her father, the Duke of Suffolk, failed and in the aftermath he, Jane, and her husband were beheaded. England would be ruled by a Catholic who over the next four years would burn almost 300 Protestants at the stake and win the nickname Bloody Mary.