May 22

1377

English heretic John Wycliffe is condemned by Pope Gregory XI

John Wycliffe (or Wyclif) (1331-84) was an English priest during the time of the Babylonian Captivity, when the papacy removed itself from Rome to the town of Avignon. There, under the severe influence of the French king and a series of French popes, the Bishop of Rome lost much respect in the eyes of believers. Coupled with high-ranking corruption and the devastation caused by the cataclysmic Black Death, the discredited Church lost ground to a number of wide-spread heresies. Among these dissident groups was one called Lollardy which sprang up in England in response to the teachings of Wycliffe.

Wycliffe’s ideas were strongly opposed to many fundamentals of the medieval Church. They included a belief in predestination and the notion of an invisible church — that the true believers constituted the real Church as opposed to its visible hierarchy. The earthly Church should be a poor one and relinquish its vast land holdings; it should abjure the doctrine of transubstantiation and possess scripture in the common tongue of the people. Perhaps most radically, Wycliffe proposed in his book On Civil Dominion that clergy in a state of sin could not hold dominion, an idea that conceivably could also be applied to secular rulers.

On May 22, 1377 Pope Gregory XI, the last pontiff of the Babylonian Captivity, condemned 18 propositions found in On Civil Dominion, sending copies of his bull to England where he expected it to be enforced. Wycliffe, however, had strong political protection from English political magnates such as John of Gaunt who favoured the notion of a politically-emasculated Church. He was able to live out his life relatively untroubled by prosecution but when his ideas were preached during the 1381 Peasant Rebellion, Lollardy fell from favour. In 1428 Wycliffe’s body was exhumed by the order of the pope, burnt and thrown into the river (see above).

May 21

2011 The world does not end.

“The Bible guarantees it”, said broadcaster Harold Camping, predicting that the world would end on May 21, 2011. Camping (1921-2013) was an American engineer who had assembled a chain of radio and television stations and made himself a popular preacher and scriptural interpreter. He soon developed an interest in Biblical chronology and end-times prophecy, writing over 30 books and tracts.  In 1970, Camping published The Biblical Calendar of History, in which he dated the Creation of the world to the year 11,013 BC and the Flood to 4990 BC.

His first prediction about the world’s end was that it would occur on September 6, 1994. When this date proved incorrect, he blamed it on a mathematical error. (Followers later said he was referring to the end of “the church age,” a time when human beings in Christian churches could be saved.) His media ministry remained popular despite this set-back but in 2010 Camping made a new set of calculations that foresaw the Rapture on May 21, 2011. On that date, he said, those predestined to salvation would be carried away to Heaven, followed by five months of brimstone and plague before the final destruction of the planet. His Family Radio ministry spent millions of dollars buying billboards and mobile signs advertising this prophecy. His followers are said to have sold businesses and houses in anticipation of the date.

When that day came and passed without planetary destruction, Camping claimed that a “spiritual” judgement had been rendered, which would be executed on October 21. In the absence of the Apocalypse on that date, Camping issued an apology and abandoned his claim to be able to foretell the end times. He suffered a stroke shortly after and died in 2013.

May 20

1520

Massacre at a Mexican Festival

In 1519 the Spanish conquistador Hernan Cortes had succeeded in invading the Aztec empire of central Mexico and controlling the Aztec emperor, Moctezuma, and the capital Tenochtitlan. Relations between the tiny Spanish contingent and the mass of Aztecs was tense and the deeds of this day in 1520 brought things to a boiling point.

Cortes had departed Tenochtitlan to head for the coast where he expected to battle some other Spaniards with orders to arrest him. He had left in charge his unstable deputy Pedro de Alvarado (shown above). During the absence of Cortes, Alvarado was approached by high-ranking Aztecs who wished to hold a festival and sought his permission lest he think they were gathering with hostile intent. Alvarado agreed, provided there would be no human sacrifice involved (a ritual that marked many Aztec festivals). When Alvarado learned that the celebrations would, in fact, include a human sacrifice he acted to halt it and massacred the participants.

That was the Spanish story. Here is the Aztec account:

Here it is told how the Spaniards killed, they murdered the Mexicans who were celebrating the Fiesta of Huitzilopochtli in the place they called The Patio of the Gods
At this time, when everyone was enjoying the celebration, when everyone was already dancing, when everyone was already singing, when song was linked to song and the songs roared like waves, in that precise moment the Spaniards determined to kill people. They came into the patio, armed for battle. They came to close the exits, the steps, the entrances [to the patio]: The Gate of the Eagle in the smallest palace, The Gate of the Canestalk and the Gate of the Snake of Mirrors. And when they had closed them, no one could get out anywhere.
Once they had done this, they entered the Sacred Patio to kill people. They came on foot, carrying swords and wooden and metal shields. Immediately, they surrounded those who danced, then rushed to the place where the drums were played. They attacked the man who was drumming and cut off both his arms. Then they cut off his head [with such a force] that it flew off, falling far away. At that moment, they then attacked all the people, stabbing them, spearing them, wounding them with their swords. They struck some from behind, who fell instantly to the ground with their entrails hanging out [of their bodies]. They cut off the heads of some and smashed the heads of others into little pieces.
They struck others in the shoulders and tore their arms from their bodies. They struck some in the thighs and some in the calves. They slashed others in the abdomen and their entrails fell to the earth. There were some who even ran in vain, but their bowels spilled as they ran; they seemed to get their feet entangled with their own entrails. Eager to flee, they found nowhere to go. Some tried to escape, but the Spaniards murdered them at the gates while they laughed. Others climbed the walls, but they could not save themselves. Others entered the communal house, where they were safe for a while. Others lay down among the victims and pretended to be dead. But if they stood up again they [the Spaniards] would see them and kill them.
The blood of the warriors ran like water as they ran, forming pools, which widened, as the smell of blood and entrails fouled the air. And the Spaniards walked everywhere, searching the communal houses to kill those who were hiding. They ran everywhere, they searched every place.
When [people] outside [the Sacred Patio learned of the massacre], shouting began, “Captains, Mexicas, come here quickly! Come here with all arms, spears, and shields! Our captains have been murdered! Our warriors have been slain! Oh Mexica captains, [our warriors] have been annihilated!”
Then a roar was heard, screams, people wailed, as they beat their palms against their lips. Quickly the captains assembled, as if planned in advance, and carried their spears and shields. Then the battle began. [The Mexicas] attacked them with arrows and even javelins, including small javelins used for hunting birds. They furiously hurled their javelins [at the Spaniards]. It was as if a layer of yellow canes spread over the Spaniards.

This massacre led to a complete breakdown of trust between the Spanish and the Aztec rulers. Rebellion against Cortes broke out and horrible deeds ensued.

May 19

Saint Dunstan

One of the most popular English saints of the Middle Ages, Dunstan (909-88) was an important political figure and Archbishop of Canterbury.

England in the tenth century was not the most stable of countries as the Anglo-Saxon rulers contended with Welsh raids on the west and with the presence of Danes in the north. A series of short-lived kings added to the confusion. In this setting Dunstan was recognized as an accomplished artist and renowned monk, rising to head up Glastonbury Abbey and then the see of Canterbury. As an advisor to rulers he experienced (or perhaps engendered) constant opposition. He was, at various times, beaten up and thrown in a cesspit, exiled and pursued. His most famous quarrel with a king came when he confronted the newly-crowned Eadwig who had chosen to skip a state banquet and cavort with (or so the story goes) two debauched women. Dunstan also seems to have been behind the dissolution of Eadwig’s marriage to Aelfgifu, one of those shady dames.

A number of legends grew up around Dustan’s encounters with the Devil. In one of these Lucifer appeared to Dunstan, who was in his forge, in the guise of a beautiful woman who employed feminine wiles in an attempt to seduce the saint. Dunstan however had spotted the cloven hooves beneath the skirt and grabbing his red-hot tongs grabbed the Devil by the nose. Local lore says the the Archfiend, to soothe his burning nose thrust it into the waters of Tunbridge Wells. To this day the spring-water is red and tastes of sulphur. Charles Dickens celebrated this confrontation in verse:

St Dunstan, as the story goes,

Once pull’d the devil by the nose

With red-hot tongs, which made him roar,

That he was heard three miles or more.

In another tale Dunstan was asked by the Devil to shoe his horse. Instead the saint nailed a horseshoe to the Devil’s foot. Dunstan agreed to remove the shoe and release the Devil only after he promised never to enter a place where a horseshoe is over the door, giving rise to the superstition of the lucky horseshoe.

Dunstan is the patron saint of blacksmiths; Charlottetown, PEI; goldsmiths; locksmiths; musicians; and silversmiths.

May 18

1812

The assassination of Prime Minister Perceval

The English-speaking world has a mixed record when it comes to political assassinations. Unlike the more excitable Latin nations who off their leaders with depressing regularity, the Anglosphere is slower on the assassination trigger but even so, there are distinctions to be made. American politicians have a high mortality rate (hello, Presidents Lincoln, Garfield,  Mckinley, and Kennedy; Governors Huey Long, Charles Bent, William Goebel, and Frank Steunenburg; and a host of judges, congressmen, and state officials) and the situation in India and Pakistan is even worse. Only one minor politician has bit the dust in Canada; Australia records only one victim and New Zealand has no assassinated rulers on its watch. Clearly the difference is the presidential system — if you have a constitutional monarchy with an elected prime minister, you are pretty safe. With one exception.

In 1812 John Bellingham (1769-1812), a failed businessman who believed that the British government had not recompensed him for bad treatment at the hands of Russians, shot Prime Minister Spencer Perceval (1762-1812). At his trial he made the following speech in his defence:

“Recollect, Gentlemen, what was my situation. Recollect that my family was ruined and myself destroyed, merely because it was Mr Perceval’s pleasure that justice should not be granted; sheltering himself behind the imagined security of his station, and trampling upon law and right in the belief that no retribution could reach him. I demand only my right, and not a favour; I demand what is the birthright and privilege of every Englishman.

Gentlemen, when a minister sets himself above the laws, as Mr Perceval did, he does it as his own personal risk. If this were not so, the mere will of the minister would become the law, and what would then become of your liberties?

I trust that this serious lesson will operate as a warning to all future ministers, and that they will henceforth do the thing that is right, for if the upper ranks of society are permitted to act wrong with impunity, the inferior ramifications will soon become wholly corrupted.

Gentlemen, my life is in your hands, I rely confidently in your justice.”

Bellingham was found guilty and hanged three days later.

May 17

1527 Anabaptist Michael Sattler condemned to death

Martin Luther’s belief that a vernacular scripture could only be read in one way by honest folk proved to be hopelessly naive and the 1520s saw the proliferation of a host of sects each claiming their version of Christianity was Biblically warranted. Among those were a group in Zürich who tried to reconstruct the church based on the behaviours they perceived in the Book of Acts. All true believers should be baptized as adults and not as children; they should espouse pacifism, abjure clerical celibacy, oaths and the devotions of the medieval church, choose their own pastors, and practise cultural separatism. These ideas marked them as dangerous radicals in the eyes of both Catholics and Protestants, resulting in intense persecution. Michael Sattler was one of the signatories to the Anabaptist Manifesto known as the “Schleichtheim Confession” of 1527.

On March 17, 1527 Sattler (an ex-monk), his wife (a former Beguine) and others were tried and condemned by authorities in Rottenburg, Germany. His punishment was ordered: “Michael Sattler shall be committed to the executioner. The latter shall take him to the square and there first cut out his tongue, and then forge him fast to a wagon and there with glowing iron tongs twice tear pieces from his body, then on the way to the site of execution five times more as above and then burn his body to powder as an arch-heretic.” Despite his mutilation Sattler was able to proclaim at the stake:  “Almighty, eternal God, thou art the way and the truth; because I have not been shown to be in error, I will with thy help on this day testify to the truth and seal it with my blood.” A bag of gunpowder had mercifully been hung from his neck and exploded when the flames reached it. His wife was punished by a “third baptism”: she was drowned.

 

May 16

1943

The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising is crushed

As a prelude to mass deportations and extermination, the German government in occupied Poland moved the Jewish population into packed and disease-ridden urban ghettos. From there they were told they would be put on trains to labour camps in the East but in fact, these journeys led only to places whose names live on in infamy: Treblinka, Sobibor, Auschwitz and Majdanek.

By early 1943 the remaining Jews of the ghetto in Warsaw knew what their fates would be — about 200,000 had already been deported — and began to resist sporadically. When German forces entered the ghetto in strength on Passover in April large-scale fighting began to take place. Various Jewish groups, separated by ideology but united in determination to go down fighting, had collected weapons, built strong-points and bunkers, and made alliances with Polish resistance fighters outside the ghetto.

For weeks they prevented the SS and Gestapo units aided by Jewish ghetto police and Polish police  from proceeding with the deportations until finally the Nazis resorted to burning down the ghetto, building by building. Some fighters escaped through tunnels to the outside where they joined the larger anti-German resistance, some committed suicide, and some surrendered. On May 16, the SS commander Jürgen Stroop (later executed for war crimes) announced the end of the uprising, marked by demolition of the synagogue, though minor incidents continued for weeks. German casualties were light but 13,000 Jews perished and a further 57,000 were deported. Stroop, who would late write a lengthy account of the battle praised the Jewish fighters. “The Jews surprised me and my officers with their determination in battle. And believe me, as veterans of World War I and SS members, we knew what determination in battle was all about. The tenacity of your Warsaw Jews took us completely by surprise. That’s the real reason the Großaktion lasted as long as it did.”

The next year, Warsaw would rise again in rebellion and again the Nazis would crush the resistance.

May 15

1948 Arab-Israeli War begins

The collapse of the Turkish Ottoman empire after World War I led to much of the Arab world being governed by Britain and France as “mandates”: the British were given Palestine and Iraq to supervise, while France took over ruling Syria and Lebanon. The most problematic of these territories was Palestine where the local Arab population resented Jewish immigration and where a number of radical Jewish groups wished to expel the British and establish an independent Jewish state. Terrorism and atrocities were the order of the day for both sides.

After the Second World War, Britain was desperate to be rid of its Palestinian mandate, having tried to keep the peace but ending up unpopular with both Arabs and Jews. In late 1947, the United Nations proposed a partition of the territory, allotting land for both a Jewish and an Arab state while maintaining Jerusalem and Bethlehem under an international regime. Both Arabs and Jews prepared for conflict, gathering troops, establishing fortifications and buying weapons abroad. Sporadic fighting broke out and terrorist attacks were undertaken. When the partition was to take effect and the republic of Israel was declared, war erupted on May 15. Irregular forces of Muslim volunteers from the Holy War Army and the Arab Liberation Army, the Arab Legion of Jordan, and the armies of Egypt, Syria and Iraq descended upon Jewish-held territories; fighting lasted over 9 months. When the smoke cleared the Israeli state had survived and expanded its territory, Jordan had seized the West Bank, and a massive relocation of refugees begun. Seventy-four years later, the wounds have not healed.

May 14

1878

America’s last witchcraft trial

Daniel Spofford

It was, appropriately enough, in Salem, Massachusetts that what came to be known as the last American witchcraft trial took place.

Lucretia Brown was a 50-year old spinster, who had been an invalid since she injured her spine in a childhood accident, when she  became a disciple of  Mary Baker Eddy. She became convinced that Christian Science had healed her but when she suffered a “relapse” in 1875, Mrs. Eddy convinced her that Daniel Spofford of Newburyport, whom Mrs. Eddy had recently excommunicated for “immorality”, was exercising mesmeric powers upon her. Eddy’s term for these powers was “Malicious Animal Magnetism”.

Mrs. Eddy believed that Spofford was an enemy of her church and tried unsuccessfully to publish an attack against him in papers throughout the county. She directed twelve of her students to spend two hours each every day around the clock in concentrated thought against Mr. Spofford to prevent him from doing further harm to her patients. She had her lawyer in Lynn draw up a bill of complaint in Lucretia Brown’s name, setting forth the injuries that Spofford had supposedly inflicted and petitioning the court to restrain him from exercising his powers against her. The text stated that “the defendant practices the art of mesmerism and by his said art and the power of his mind influences and controls the minds and bodies of other persons for the purpose of injuring the persons and property and social relations of others”.

Mrs Eddy’s attorney refused to argue the case in court, so she ordered her student Edward Arens to do so and twenty of her followers to stand as witnesses. On June 3, 1875 they assembled at the railway station in Lynn for the train to Salem. The Boston Globe reported that one of the appointed witnesses approached Mrs. Eddy to complain that he knew nothing whatever about the case and would not know what to say, whereupon she assured him that he would be told what to say. At the courthouse in Salem, nearly two centuries after the witchcraft hysteria, the last charge of witchcraft in this country was brought to trial. Mr. Spofford did not bother to appear. When Mr. Arens rose before Judge Horace Gray and presented the bill of complaint, Mr. Spofford’s attorney Mr. Noyes objected. Judge Gray declared that it was not within the power of the Court to control Mr. Spofford’s mind, even if he were to be jailed. Mrs Eddy was not given any opportunity to argue that disease could be the work of mesmeric powers, and the case was dismissed due to “defects in the writ.”

Lucretia Brown lived out her life still convinced of her Christian Science beliefs, dying in 1883 of pneumonia after refusing medical care.

May 14

1878

America’s last witchcraft trial

It was, appropriately enough, in Salem, Massachusetts that what came to be known as the last American witchcraft trial took place.

Lucretia Brown was a 50-year old spinster, who had been an invalid since she injured her spine in a childhood accident, when she  became a disciple of  Mary Baker Eddy. She became convinced that Christian Science had healed her but, when she suffered a “relapse” in 1875, Mrs. Eddy convinced her that Daniel Spofford of Newburyport (pictured above), whom Mrs. Eddy had recently excommunicated for “immorality”, was exercising mesmeric powers upon her. Eddy’s term for these powers was “Malicious Animal Magnetism”.

Mrs. Eddy believed that Spofford was an enemy of her church and tried unsuccessfully to publish an attack against him in papers throughout the county. She directed twelve of her students to spend two hours each every day around the clock in concentrated thought against Mr. Spofford to prevent him from doing further harm to her patients. She had her lawyer in Lynn draw up a bill of complaint in Lucretia Brown’s name, setting forth the injuries that Spofford had supposedly inflicted and petitioning the court to restrain him from exercising his powers against her. The text stated that “the defendant practices the art of mesmerism and by his said art and the power of his mind influences and controls the minds and bodies of other persons for the purpose of injuring the persons and property and social relations of others”.

Mrs Eddy’s attorney refused to argue the case in court, so she ordered her student Edward Arens to do so and twenty of her followers to stand as witnesses. On June 3, 1875 they assembled at the railway station in Lynn for the train to Salem. The Boston Globe reported that one of the appointed witnesses approached Mrs. Eddy to complain that he knew nothing whatever about the case and would not know what to say, whereupon she assured him that he would be told what to say. At the courthouse in Salem, nearly two centuries after the witchcraft hysteria, the last charge of witchcraft in this country was brought to trial. Mr. Spofford did not bother to appear. When Mr. Arens rose before Judge Horace Gray and presented the bill of complaint, Mr. Spofford’s attorney, Mr. Noyes, objected. Judge Gray declared that it was not within the power of the Court to control Mr. Spofford’s mind, even if he were to be jailed. Mrs Eddy was not given any opportunity to argue that disease could be the work of mesmeric powers, and the case was dismissed due to “defects in the writ.”

Lucretia Brown lived out her life still convinced of her Christian Science beliefs, dying in 1883 of pneumonia after refusing medical care.